Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add filters

Document Type
Year range
1.
Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie ; 55(SUPPL 1):49-49, 2022.
Article in German | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-2012835
2.
Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie ; 55(SUPPL 1):89-89, 2022.
Article in German | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-2012834
3.
Innovation in Aging ; 5:529-529, 2021.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-2012833
4.
Jfr-Journal of Family Research ; 34(1):563-581, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1818924

ABSTRACT

Objective: In this paper we ask how and through which social practices age and family are relationally being un/done in the course of the pandemic in Germany, and how these un/doings shape, shift or even break intergenerational relations. Background: The spread of the coronavirus and the attempts of governments to slow it down are severely affecting livelihoods worldwide. The institutionalised ageism underlying these government measures affects the youngest and oldest in society in particular (Ayalon et al. 2020;van Dyk et al. 2020). Intergenerational relations of social reproduction enacted, inter alia, through practices of eldercare, grandparenting, or voluntary work, are significantly limited in the current pandemic, as older adults are framed as an 'at-risk group', children as 'silent transmitters', and young adults as a 'risky group' (Ayalon et al. 2020;Stokes & Patterson 2020). These constructions contribute to the constitution, stabilisation and 'doing' of age in the pandemic. Method: We present findings from longitudinal research that was conducted through qualitative, problem-centred interviews between March 2020 and February 2021 with persons of different ages living in different household and care constellations in Germany. Results: Whereas in non-pandemic times doing age can be constitutive for doing family - as a constellation traditionally perceived to comprise multiple generations - we see the opposite happening in the pandemic: as age-based government measures to contain the spread of the virus limit intergenerational relations, older adults face the risk of being excluded from families. Hence, doing age can lead to a redoing or even an undoing of family. Conclusion: The paper outlines the potential of a 'linking ages' approach for the study of family lives and of intergenerational relations in times of crises.

5.
Anthropology in Action ; 27(2):68-72, 2020.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-985793

ABSTRACT

During the government-imposed contact restrictions in Germany, Austria and Switzerland, older adults feared that they may no longer be able to experience physical contact with family members. They were, however, given hope by a ‘cuddle curtain’, a device that promised to enable familial intimacy while blocking the exposure of older bodies to the coronavirus. Our research team traced how one such artefact was used in nursing homes in Switzerland. Here, we discuss its cultural biography to explore notions of intimacy by relating discussions about the curtain to anthropological discussions about entanglement and detach-ment. We contrast positive associations between the curtain and familial intimacy with regu-lations surrounding body fluid barriers in sex work, in order to relate the ‘thing’ to the larger context within which it circulates. © Berghahn Books and the Association for Anthropology in Action.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL